This year, 2024, marked somewhat of a return to movie theatres for a lot of Americans. It’s no secret that Hollywood has struggled to bounce-back from the effects of the pandemic, but this year, the movies are back. This summer’s craze of Barbenheimer—the dual release event of two very different movies, Barbie and Oppenheimer—drove people back into the world of cinema. And I think most people who saw both movies loved them, because they reminded us of the fun of going to the theatre and showed us just how good our movies could be.
So, when the Academy Award nominations came out, they created a lot of discourse—I think, because more people than ever could contribute to the conversation. They may not have seen all 10 Best Picture nominees, but they definitely saw 2 of them, and those two were expected to dominate a lot of the categories. So when Margot Robbie missed out on a Best Actress nom, and Greta Gerwig didn’t get a nod for Best Director, people were understandably surprised. Frustrated, even.
However, the dialogue from the film community—the folks who are active on Letterboxd, the ones who always see all the Best Picture films, the people who added a film studies minor in college—told us that we shouldn’t have been surprised, that our perception of these performances was wrong. “Barbie was Greta Gerwig’s worst film”, and “the Best Actress category is loaded, Margot’s performance is not better than any of the women who were nominated.” Our anger is unjustified, our idea of a “good” movie is wrong.
This annoyed me greatly, for reasons I’ll get into. But at the time of the Oscars nominations, I had only seen three of the 10 Best Picture films, so I figured before I weighed in, I should make sure I’m informed on all the movies in the conversation. Now, I have watched all 10 movies, and I’m going to provide you with my thoughts on all of them, as well as what awards I think they’ll win, and whether I think they are “good” movies.
10. Maestro
Bradley Cooper’s magnum opus, Maestro is a dramatic biopic 6 years in the making. It is focused on the life of Leonard Bernstein, an American composer and conductor famous from the mid- to late-1900s. Cooper stars in the film as well as directs, and even helped write the script, so the movie really is his baby. Let me tell you why I have this movie ranked last.
While the performances of Bradley Cooper and Carey Mulligan, who plays Bernstein’s wife, are incredible, the movie itself isn’t nearly as gripping as a 2+ hour movie should be. One person remarked, and I agree, that Cooper seemed to focus the film on the least-exciting aspects of Bernstein’s life. There was minimal inclusion of his work on Broadway, and relatively no coverage of his activism—protests against the Vietnam War, raising money for HIV/AIDS awareness, supporting the civil rights movement, and more. Instead, the movie is very centrally focused on Bernstein’s nuclear family, and how his art and his struggles affected their lives. This doesn’t automatically make the movie boring—I love slice of life films—but I think it was a little ambitious to attempt to cover this entire life and relationship. Some parts are moving, but simultaneously so much and nothing at all happens, and it was hard to stay engaged.
My other gripe with this film comes with the cinematography. The Academy loves when a movie is in black and white. It’s the exact vein of pretentious film-bait that will make your movie seem good, even if it isn’t. Because of my strong feelings about this, if a movie is going to be in black and white, they need to justify it to me, the viewer. There needs to be a reason for it, and I couldn’t figure out the reason in Maestro. I think the cinematographer thought “this is what an Oscars movie looks like,” and that’s the entire reason for it. But that’s just not good enough to me.
Award predictions: Best Makeup and Hairstyling
9. Zone of Interest
Certainly the shortest Best Picture nominee, Zone of Interest is an international film that tells the chilling story of the family of the commandant at Auschwitz, as they build their life in a new home right next to the concentration camp.
My mom can tell you that I have always had a morbid interest in the Holocaust—I even studied human rights in Germany, and visited a concentration camp while I was there. This movie, despite never taking the viewer inside of Auschwitz, never showing us the atrocities up close, still does an impressive job of creating tension and contrast. We watch the family go through clothes delivered to the house, picking out what they want to keep; it’s never said, but it’s understood that these are the clothes of people who have been killed in Auschwitz. This underlying stress, and the fact that the film trusts the viewers to fill in their own context for a lot of the horrors, is what is most impressive about this film.
However, my mom offered the most apt review of this movie—if it didn’t take place next to a concentration camp, it would be a very boring movie. Even so, it sometimes teeters on the line. The director relies on a lot of long, drawn-out shots where the camera is very still. There is very little dialogue, the film instead using sound effects and the abrupt, disconcerting score to indicate how the audience should feel. I watched the movie with a morbid curiosity, but it is difficult to watch a film focused entirely on the villains, and not see them suffer a repercussions. The film ends before the war does—we are left with a few chilling shots of Auschwitz today, and the hundreds of thousands of shoes on display, which is all that remains of the lives lost there.
Award predictions: Best International Feature Film, Best Sound
8. American Fiction
One thing I will say about American Fiction is it is unlike any of the other Best Picture nominees. This film has potentially the most digestible cinematography—it is the most understandable, similar to the direction of a “non-Oscars” movie. The story of the film also pushes an interesting politic, definitely unique to the Academy’s usual films.
The film focuses on a Black author and professor, Monk (Jeffery Wright), who is frustrated with the current expectations for his books. He sees that the only Black stories that readers are interested in play into stereotypes, which he believes mischaracterize the breadth and potential of the Black community. Fed up, Monk writes a satirical book full of all the tropes that annoy him, and to his chagrin, publishers love it. The film follows Monk grappling with internal conflict regarding the success of his own work, as well as dealing with various trials and tribulations in his own family.
Reading summaries of the film, I expected a more pessimistic message and plot, but the true focus is more so on Monk’s family rather than his publishing woes. The movie is also funny—I feel like it’s rare to see a comedy nominated for Best Picture, but American Fiction’s smart, liberal wit both increases the viewer’s enjoyment of the movie and supports the political message of the movie.
And what is the political message of the movie? I think it warns against the dangers that white people often fall victim to regarding representation and stereotype, which is that we only want to see diverse stories when they fit into our perception of what those stories should be. However, the movie also offers a nuanced perspective about cliches and stereotypes—sometimes they are ‘common’ because they are true. And we can’t think less of those stories just because they fit into a narrative that we don’t like. People contain multitudes, and many things can be true at once.
Ultimately, I did enjoy this movie, but I like the others on this list more. But if you’re looking for a movie that you can watch with your parents, or you want to start a conversation, then I recommend this one above others.
Award predictions: Best Adapted Screenplay
7. Past Lives
Now this is a slice of life movie! I watched this movie on a plane, and let me tell you that was the perfect place to watch it. There were no distractions, I had nothing but time, and I could sit with my thoughts when the movie finished.
Past Lives follows two childhood friends from South Korea as they connect and fall away from each other and reconnect again, always wondering what could have been. The movie spans their entire life, and we can see the decisions each characters make, and we ask ourselves how things would have been different if they chose each other instead.
The entire movie focuses on a Korean concept called “In Yun”, which means reincarnation. Essentially, it means that you have the relationship with people you are close with in your life now because you were somehow connected in a past life. Each life, you grow closer and closer to these people. The two main characters in Past Lives don’t end up together, but they both agree—maybe in the next life.
This is the type of movie that I love, but I understand that not everyone will love it. It is quite long, and its pacing ebbs and flows. Some people may find it boring, and that’s okay. It’s a simple movie. But if you enjoy movies that make you reflect on your own relationships, make you consider how your life got to this point, then this could be a movie you enjoy.
Award predictions: none 😦 but it’s still a great movie!
6. Killers of the Flower Moon
This film was the last of the Best Picture nominees that I saw, because it is a doozy. It’s a commitment to watch—I broke it up into about 3 or 4 segments, which helped with being able to digest the entire story. And what a chilling story it is.
Scorsese tells the horrifying true story of the Osage murders of the 1920s, and the way greed can make people do terrible things even to those they claim to love. The acting performances in this movie especially are incredible, with Lily Gladstone leading the way as the favorite for Best Actress. I think you’ll be surprised to know that she isn’t my pick to win. But it cannot be overstated how convincing all of the performances in this movie are, and how committed they all are to telling this twisted tale.
Scorsese is a very talented director. You can really tell that he put a lot of thought into how he wanted to share this truth with the world. And for such a violent premise, I was surprised at the delicacy with which the violence was depicted. I wouldn’t describe the movie as gory, or gratuitous. Rather, the way that the murders are shown feels honest, harrowing, and respectful to the history of these events.
Because of the Osage murders’ place in our American history, and the importance of finally centering Indigenous actors in Hollywood, I think everyone should see this movie. However, the reason it doesn’t rank higher is simple—the movie crop is loaded this year, and I think there are still better films in this category. To me, a Best Picture winner needs to strike an important balance between being high in quality of directing, acting, and writing, while also being understandable and digestible to the the greatest amount of people. Films that are too esoteric can’t be considered “good” to me—and I understand that might be a hot take—but they do need to have a standard of quality that elevates them beyond “watchable.” Killers of the Flower Moon is a great movie, but it doesn’t achieve that necessary balance for me.
Award predictions: Best Cinematography, Best Film Editing
5. Barbie
I know I talked a big game about the perception of Barbie as a good movie—and it is good!—but having now watched all the Best Picture nominees, even I need to admit that it doesn’t crack top 3 in my rankings.
Barbie is great at a lot of things. It carries a great humor, it creates this incredible world of Barbieland, it makes women feel seen in such a deep way. Writing a movie about a toy is no small feat, and I am really impressed with the story that Greta Gerwig chose to tell. However, when I think about the other films Greta Gerwig has directed, I can acknowledge that I found her direction more impressive in both Little Women and Lady Bird (two of my favorite films of all time). Barbie suffers the same fate as American Fiction—it’s too digestible, its politics are too understandable. For its incredible box office success and its appeal to so many viewers, it deserves its Best Picture nomination. But I don’t think it will win.
(Even though I understand that the Best Actress category is absolutely stacked, I still think Margot Robbie deserved a nomination. Barbie isn’t the movie that it is without her performance. She is truly the heart and soul of the movie, and I think she deserves to be acknowledged for that. I still have some righteous anger left in me!)
Award predictions: Best Original Song (“What was I made for?” by Billie Eilish), Best Production Design
4. Anatomy of a Fall
This movie really took me by surprise. A French film, Anatomy of a Fall follows author Sandra Voyter through a public and invasive trial that attempts to determine the cause of her husband’s death—did he fall, or was he pushed?
The premise of the film is quite unique, and I like that (SPOILERS) it leaves the audience wondering, to the very end. We never find out how her husband died. What we do understand is their marriage, how complicated a life can be between two artists, how every mistake, every offhanded comment can be used against you in a court of law. The main actress, who also stars in Zone of Interest, is incredible—she truly embodies Sandra and humanizes her for the audience in a very special way.
The script is the most impressive aspect of the film for me—utilizing both French and English, and the dynamics between the two languages is an important part of the plot. The movie is very dialogue-driven, and I think the writing is very natural in a way that drives that story forward without providing too much obvious exposition.
If you like mystery, if you like ambiguous endings, if you like complicated characters, then you will certainly like Anatomy of a Fall. Unfortunately, the reason it isn’t my Best Picture winner is that it’s not big enough. Which is fine, not all movies need to cover a grand scale. But when the movies this year tackle the stories that they have, it’s understandable that the award for Best Picture would go to a movie with a more epic proportion.
Award predictions: Best Original Screenplay, Best On-Screen Dog (not a real category, but should be)
3. The Holdovers
Another beautiful slice of life movie, The Holdovers focuses on the teachers and staff at an East coast boarding school who are responsible for watching the students that stay at school over winter break—the “holdovers.” This is another very character-driven movie, in the best way; our three main characters, teacher Paul Hunham (Paul Giamatti), student Angus Tully (Dominic Sessa), and cafeteria lady Mary Lamb (Da’Vine Joy Randolph), learn more about themselves and each other, and find family in one another for the holiday season.
When the movie starts, it seems right in line with the great high school movies of decades past—specifically invoking Dead Poets Society vibes (another one of my favorite movies). But pretty soon you realize that Paul Giamatti is not Robin Williams, and these students are a lot more difficult than the eager poets. Nevertheless, the movie tugs on your heartstrings in such a delightful way, leaving you feeling both sad and hopeful—much like our main characters.
This is a good movie, for sure. It makes you feel, the acting is excellent, the directing is recognizable and nostalgic. The reason it can’t win Best Picture is it’s too heartwarming. In a year like this, the Academy is going to want a movie that will leave you feeling complicated. The movies that stick with you often do leave you with more complex emotions—you simply have more to chew on. The Holdovers is wonderful, but its message is simple—too simple for the Academy to give it Best Picture.
Award predictions: Best Actor in a Leading Role, Best Actress in a Supporting Role
2. Poor Things
I’ll warn you now, this movie is weird. Probably weirder than you’re used to. And that’s why it isn’t my Best Picture winner—I don’t think it appeals to a wide enough audience. That being said, if you can suspend your disbelief and get past the weird—this movie is awesome.
Emma Stone gives an unbelievable performance as Bella, a corpse reanimated, a child’s brain inside an adult woman’s body learning about life and the world. You may start watching this movie and think, “hey, this is in black and white, why didn’t you hate it?” And that’s a fair point—but the film explains the reason for the being half in black and white, and half in color. Once Bella starts to gain experiences in the world, and learn more about her own existence, the film adds color. The score simultaneously gets more complex as the movie progresses, signifying Bella’s brain developing to understand more and more.
It’s a fantastical movie, set somewhere between the past and the future, and its physical set design does wonders to really bring the setting to life. The cinematography is wacky, often using wide angle and fish-eye lenses to really make the audience feel like they’re on the outside looking in. Every aspect of the movie is deliberate, and I think that’s incredibly special.
Plus, the acting performances are really stellar. Mark Ruffalo probably won’t win Best Supporting Actor, but he would deserve it for his depiction of the malicious yet pathetic Duncan Wedderburn. Emma Stone is my dark horse pick to win Best Actress—the way she convincingly plays the complicated role that is Bella Baxter would be enough for her to be the outright favorite in any other year.
If you can manage to go into the movie with an open mind, and just let it wash over you—I promise, you’ll enjoy it too.
Award predictions: Best Actress in a Leading Role, Best Costume Design, Best Original Score
1. Oppenheimer
By now, I’m sure you’ve figured out my pick for Best Picture—the other half of Barbenheimer, Christopher Nolan’s latest masterpiece. Not only is Oppenheimer the most gripping and entertaining 3 hour movie I’ve ever seen, I think it also achieves that fragile and necessary balance that a Best Picture winner requires—it’s entertaining and understandable to a wider audience, but it’s also a creative expression in its direction and production, and the truly exceptional acting performances carry it to greatness.
I really considered selecting the Oppenheimer nominees to sweep 3 of the 4 acting categories—I still think it’s possible. Cillian Murphy is definitely the favorite for Best Actor, which he deserves, and Emily Blunt does an outstanding job in her supporting role. But the one that I simply will not compromise on is Robert Downey Jr to win Best Supporting Actor. This is easily his best performance in years—he came back on the scene and reminded everyone of his talent. There are some great actors nominated with him as well, but for his transformation to play the serious Admiral Strauss he deserves to take the Oscar.
I think Nolan will also take it home for Best Directing. Like I said, this is the most entertaining 3 hour movie I’ve ever seen. The movie spans a lot of time but it’s necessary. And Nolan does a great job of building tension throughout the movie, and even leaving you with some lingering tension when the film ends.
I have made a lot of claims about what the Best Picture winner needs to be: the politics need to be nuanced, the scale needs to be large, the movie needs to be appealing to many, the production must be artistic, the message needs to linger. I think Oppenheimer out of all the nominees has these qualities. The politics are nuanced—we are left wondering the same thing as the actors in the film: was making the atomic bomb the right thing to do? Did we stop a brutal war, or bring an even greater evil into our world? We are left thinking about how our reality was forever changed, and how it may change even still. The scale is certainly large—the movie spans decades, different eras of our American history, with a massive ensemble cast. The production feels like an Academy Award-winning movie, with many artful shots, unique interludes, and deliberate choices in how to tell the story through film.
Award predictions: Best Picture, Best Actor in a Supporting Role, Best Directing
If you’re still with me—thanks. This is a long one, I know. But I want to finish by saying that the Oscars are for a very specific audience, one that is likely a very small subject of the people that watch movies. Just because this small set of film critics decide that this is the “best” movie of the year, doesn’t mean that’s true. Art is subjective! You’re allowed to like Barbie more than Oppenheimer, you’re allowed to think Poor Things is too weird, you’re allowed to think American Fiction is the smartest movie of the decade. All of these things can be true. And when something gets popular, we have to think about why. Saying that you like Little Women better than Barbie is fine, but you can’t deny that Barbie has some sort of quality that makes it appealing to a large amount of people. It’s rare for that many people to be wrong.
And for the pretentious readers, I urge you to remember that just because something is complicated doesn’t mean it’s good. Simple doesn’t mean bad. Things don’t need to be incomprehensible—sometimes, being understood by many is a good thing.